Much of the “cultural cognition” problem around our climate politics and discourse derives from the politics of “mitigation” – the fact that the tools needed to reduce greenhouse gases are politically (culturally?) abhorrent to some, who in response dismiss the underlying science of climate change.
This has the effect of foreclosing the second crucial climate change response, which involved the role of government, politics, policy, and community in taking the steps needed to adapt to the change that’s clearly already upon us.
OtPR does a terrific job outlining the problems in a discussion of Devin Nunes, a congressman from California’s Central Valley:
There is a whole suite of reasonable preparations and solutions that the southern San Joaquin Valley will need desperately. Some of those are best done by government. When the governmental representative is denying the entire concept, I’m pretty sure that he’s not allocating more money to researching tree strains that require less chilling hours. Governments were needed to manage the thousands of cow carcasses; this is foreseeable, and a good representative could have been working on getting plans in place. Researching Valley Fever and asthma, planting urban trees, fighting fires, cutting down dead trees in the Sierras to protect communities. An elected representative that is watching reality closely, with a scientific understanding of the phenomenon, would be bringing money and plans home to the district.