<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stuff I Wrote Elsewhere: E-Mails Don&#8217;t Put Water in the Colorado River</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/?p=4186</link>
	<description>A few thoughts from John Fleck, a writer of journalism and other things, living in New Mexico</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:53:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Fairfield</title>
		<link>http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/?p=4186&#038;cpage=1#comment-276261</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Fairfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/?p=4186#comment-276261</guid>
		<description>If I had an economically affordable way to convert local brackish water to clean drinking water, would anyone care and would they help us get such a thing going locally?

I seem to have such a way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had an economically affordable way to convert local brackish water to clean drinking water, would anyone care and would they help us get such a thing going locally?</p>
<p>I seem to have such a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Liddell</title>
		<link>http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/?p=4186&#038;cpage=1#comment-276260</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Liddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/?p=4186#comment-276260</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this - one of the most thoughtful responses to the otherwise slanted media stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this &#8211; one of the most thoughtful responses to the otherwise slanted media stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/?p=4186&#038;cpage=1#comment-276250</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/?p=4186#comment-276250</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s peculiar to say it doesn&#039;t affect &quot;basic&quot; climate science since it doesn&#039;t affect climate science at all.

Anyway, time to give those CRU emails a rest.

Nitpick:  Talking about using the change in basin hydrology as proof of AGW is an odd way to put things.  The analysis connecting them would proceed from the top down and wind up with the conclusion that AGW is causing the hydrology change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s peculiar to say it doesn&#8217;t affect &#8220;basic&#8221; climate science since it doesn&#8217;t affect climate science at all.</p>
<p>Anyway, time to give those CRU emails a rest.</p>
<p>Nitpick:  Talking about using the change in basin hydrology as proof of AGW is an odd way to put things.  The analysis connecting them would proceed from the top down and wind up with the conclusion that AGW is causing the hydrology change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
