jfleck at inkstain

A few thoughts from John Fleck, a writer of journalism and other things, living in New Mexico

Consensus Science

Posted on | September 8, 2006 | 1 Comment

I have tried several times, with varying degrees of success, to tackle the “consensus ain’t science” shibboleth. (See especially here and the comments here).

Andrew Dessler recently took an excellent stab at this in a couple of posts: see here and here.

Might a “consensus” position be wrong? Of course. All knowledge is provisional and subject to future revision as new data comes in. However, as policymakers, the scientific consensus is the position most likely to be correct. In particular, strongly held consensus positions (e.g., smoking causes cancer, the Earth is warming) are verly unlikely to turn out to be wrong. Policymakers can do no better than to follow the scientific consensus in formulating their policy.

Related posts:

  1. Gleick on “consensus science”
  2. The Climate Change Consensus
  3. More from Dessler
  4. The Climate Change Consensus
  5. The Problem with Consensus

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Category: climate variability, science

Comments

One Response to “Consensus Science”

  1. Kit Stolz
    September 10th, 2006 @ 11:42 am

    Kelly Redmond, a climatologist with the Desert Research Institute, puts it another way:

    “Consensus is the hardest forecast to beat.”

    For more, see:

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/9/9/154714/4417

Leave a Reply