It’s a bait and switch. The answer is “no”. (It always is when it ends with a question mark. See Betteridge’s Law of Headlines.) But as I report in my water newsletter, there are some encouraging signs that we’re moving in the right direction.
You can subscribe to the newsletter, which is supposed to come out weekly but rarely does (hey, you get what you pay for!) here.
conservation –> conversation
Meanwhile: a study released last month by the U.S. Geological Survey found that groundwater sustains more than half the flow of rivers in the upper part of the Colorado River Basin, a finding that exacerbates the need to protect the resource, especially since a 2015 study done by a team of NASA scientists found that some 13 trillion gallons of groundwater had been lost from the Colorado River Basin since NASA began collecting data in 2004. (High Country News; 06/20/2016) https://www.hcn.org/articles/more-than-half-of-the-rivers-in-the-upper-colorado-basin-originate-as-groundwater
Thanks, I had not read Sarah’s story. But re that NASA study, see also – https://www.inkstain.net/fleck/2015/12/new-paper-clarifies-what-satellite-data-is-telling-us-about-colorado-river-basin-groundwater-pumping/ – on a second study clarifying what the satellites are and are not telling us.