Europe vs. America on Climate: a Hypothesis

The ubiquitous Andy Revkin has a delightful little bit of speculation in this morning’s New York Times regarding the differences between U.S. and European attitudes toward climate change: Some climate experts muse that the innately variegated climate across the country might help explain why it has taken longer for human-caused global warming to rise to …

Continue reading ‘Europe vs. America on Climate: a Hypothesis’ »

The Inconvenience of the IPCC

I see via Prometheus that David Roberts has taken up my challenge offered in the comments of a previous thread about whether Al Gore is representative of the mainstream consensus or an outlier (as suggested by Andy Revkin in his recent New York Times piece). I argued that Gore’s treatment of hurricanes and sea level …

Continue reading ‘The Inconvenience of the IPCC’ »

I thought sea level rise was accelerating

From S.J. Holgate, in GRL: The rate of sea level change was found to be larger in the early part of last century (2.03 ± 0.35 mm/yr 1904–1953), in comparison with the latter part (1.45 ± 0.34 mm/yr 1954–2003). On the decadal rates of sea level change during the twentieth century, GRL, Vol. 34, L01602, …

Continue reading ‘I thought sea level rise was accelerating’ »

Revkin on the nonskeptical heretics

Andrew Revkin does a nice job in this morning’s New York Times in characterizing those scientists that Roger Pielke Jr. has described as the “nonskeptical heretics”: A third stance is now emerging, espoused by many experts who challenge both poles of the debate. They agree that accumulating carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping smokestack and tailpipe …

Continue reading ‘Revkin on the nonskeptical heretics’ »