Communicating Science

Matthew Nisbet nails the New York Times’ hanging curve ball in his analysis of the problems of the collision between science and journalism, quoting Andrew Revkin’s fabulous line about “the tyranny of the news peg.” The context is a piece by the always provocative Gary Taubes about the problems of epidemiological research. I’ve given a …

Continue reading ‘Communicating Science’ »

Stuff I Wrote Elsewhere

On geo-engineering: In pursuing the idea, Wingenter is entering a scientific-political minefield— the field of what is called “geo-engineering.” The most widely discussed geo-engineering proposal, pushed by Lowell Wood of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, involves a fleet of jets spewing aerosols that would deflect the sun’s rays, cooling the planet in the process. …

Continue reading ‘Stuff I Wrote Elsewhere’ »

On Democrats and Designated Hitters

Never let it be said that political scientists shy away from the important questions: Since its introduction in 1973, major league baseball’s designated hitter (DH) rule has been the subject of continuing controversy. Here, we investigate the political and socio–demographic determinants of public opinion toward theDHrule, using data from a nationwide poll conducted during September …

Continue reading ‘On Democrats and Designated Hitters’ »

Dissension in the Ranks

From Jay Lindsay: Jim Riccio, of Greenpeace, said nuclear advocates are exploiting global warming fears to try to revive an industry that’s too risky to fool with. “You have better ways to boil water,” Riccio said. But environmentalists aren’t in lockstep on the issue. Bill Chameides, chief scientist for Environmental Defense, said anything that helps …

Continue reading ‘Dissension in the Ranks’ »