Nukes and Climate Change

The collision of nuclear power and climate change is one of the more fascinating political and public policy debates afoot. Today’s case in point: a Financial Times story about a new Deutsche Bank study: Germany will miss its CO2 emission targets, face rising electricity prices and become “dramatically” more reliant on Russian gas if it …

Continue reading ‘Nukes and Climate Change’ »

David’s Dirty Hippies

David Roberts, who has gotten a lot of leftie blogosphere traction with his dirty hippie post, is at it again. Here’s David, describing the point he made on a conservative talk show (“one of the B-list Limbaughs”) yesterday: The IPCC is one of the most rigorous scientific processes ever developed, and its new report pegs …

Continue reading ‘David’s Dirty Hippies’ »

Peak Oil

One of my favorite science journalists, Alex Witze, had an excellent recent piece in Nature on peak oil (sub. req.). It’s a terrific bit of work because of the thoughtful way Witze embraces the uncertainty, explaining to us why smart and reasonable people disagree about this issue, rather than trying to tell us which answer …

Continue reading ‘Peak Oil’ »

The Inconvenience of the IPCC

I see via Prometheus that David Roberts has taken up my challenge offered in the comments of a previous thread about whether Al Gore is representative of the mainstream consensus or an outlier (as suggested by Andy Revkin in his recent New York Times piece). I argued that Gore’s treatment of hurricanes and sea level …

Continue reading ‘The Inconvenience of the IPCC’ »