Pundits for Hire

Paul D. Thacker, in a New Republic piece, tags Steven Milloy, the “Junk Science” king, with the paid-pundit spray can, that so recently smeared our old friend Michael Fumento: But, whereas Scripps Howard fired Fumento and apologized to its readers, Fox News continues to look the other way as Milloy accepts corporate handouts. And it’s …

Continue reading ‘Pundits for Hire’ »

Listening to the Economists

Nature, in an editorial in tomorrow’s edition, argues that the IPCC is falling short in not including the lateste economists have to offer in it’s next assessment round: The inclusive nature of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is currently preparing its fourth assessment of global warming for publication late next year, has …

Continue reading ‘Listening to the Economists’ »

Ignoring Inconvenient Facts

Roger Pielke Jr. links to a report on a study that identified a remarkable ability of our brains to ignore inconvenient facts: The test subjects on both sides of the political aisle reached totally biased conclusions by ignoring information that could not rationally be discounted, Westen and his colleagues say. Then, with their minds made …

Continue reading ‘Ignoring Inconvenient Facts’ »

Infill

Reminded by Coco’s trenchant observations on the politics of impact fees, I’ve a question: of all those new home permits being issued in the metro area, what proportion is in multi-home developments, and what proportion is in single-lot infill around the city’s fringes? My anecdotes tell me infill is going gangbusters right now, but I …

Continue reading ‘Infill’ »

A Trifle

More evidence that the British own this language and we’re just borrowing it for a bit. From New Scientist, the story of a chap “who confused his guests at a dinner party by apologising for an astringent apple-based dessert, saying:” This pie is a trifle tart.