Texas Drought

texas drought map

Betsy Blaney is a reporter after my own heart. The theme is Texas drought. The story has numbers:

The first 11 months of 2006 rank as the 31st driest January-through-November stretch since 1895. Average rainfall for that period was 23 inches, down from the normal of 26.02 inches, the National Weather Service said.

Compounding the lack of rainfall is a statewide average temperature of 68.9 degrees, the second warmest January through November on record.

“You put those together and it’s not good,” National Weather Service meteorologist Victor Murphy said.

In contrast to drought stories I’ve complained about in the past, this one has data, and the data is consistent with actual drought, as opposed to farmers’ and ranchers’ perception of drought. But it’s also pretty clear that, in a warming world, if Texas farmers and ranchers can’t cope with what’s essentially a one-in-three dry year, there’s trouble ahead. That temperature trend isn’t going anywhere.

Nile Deal

The AP’s Charles Hanely reports that a deal is near between the nine nations that share (or don’t share) the waters of the Nile:

After three years of closed-door talks, nine nations are quietly edging toward a deal to jointly oversee the waters of the Nile, an agreement that has eluded lands along the great river since the days of the pharaohs.

An expected meeting of water ministers next month may produce a preliminary accord, officials say.

Such a pact would right a colonial-era wrong that reserved the world’s longest river for irrigation in Egypt and Sudan, effectively denying its waters to Uganda and other upriver countries.

But there may be less here than meets the eye. Cracking the Nile problem is one of the great international water struggles. Hanley’s story suggests the agreement is modest:

The agreement among Nile nations wouldn’t assign shares of river water but would formalize the principle of equal voices and establish a nine-nation commission to tackle detailed issues later.

It is impossible to say just what I mean!

John Coltrane

There’s a story I heard once about John Coltrane: that he spent his whole musical career looking for the right saxophone mouthpiece. He was searching for the sound he heard in his head.

I was thinking of that Wednesday morning, curled up in the den reading as the snow fell outside. I’m in the midst of Peter Turchi’s Maps of the Imagination, a challenging book analogizing writer and mapmaker.

Turchi was talking about T.S. Eliot, who I had read at a very impressionable age, when I was imagining what it might be to be a writer. I went over to the bookshelf and grabbed my old college text, the wonderful battered Norton Anthology of American Literature. It’s a wonderful tome, printed on a thin sort of onionskin paper that allowed them to pack 2,590 pages of the American literary canon in a single volume.

Rereading The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, I was struck by the line I had marked with a ballpoint pen those many years ago:

It is impossible to say just what I mean!

I have no idea what that 18-year-old had in mind when that line struck him enough to point it out to his future self.

I love jazz, and I love art. I enjoy both in a similar way, piecing together the linkages and history and story that goes with them. Thursday morning, it was Bill Evans I was listening to as the snow fell. As I started thinking about the ideas I am now trying to explain to you, I looked up to this great painting on the wall above my head. It’s by my dad – the Grand Canyon or something like it, a piece I’ve stared at in one way or another since I was a small boy, assimilating without being conscious of it an aesthetic that carries me to this day. When I go to art museums, I piece together the history on the walls in a way that only makes sense as a piece of the art I grew up staring at.

I do not have to paint, or to make music, so I can listen and I look with great comfort. But I have never been a comfortable reader. It is because, after a lifetime of trying to write things down, I understand how hard it is to pick what it is that needs to be said out of all the noise around me. And once that is done, it is even harder to say just what I mean. I don’t mean to try to compare myself to Eliot or Coltrane here, but if it was hard for them – great artists in command of their tools – how could it be anything less than impossible for me?

A few lines later, Eliot’s Prufrock turns toward the window to say:

That is not it at all,

That is not what I meant, at all.

TV Haiku

They are ritualized art, the movie summaries in the daily TV listings – usually less than 10 words to summarize an entire film. Today’s favorite: Patton:

Gen. George S. Patton fights World War II.

Quacks in the Internet Age

wacky climate change book

The Internet has made it too easy to be a quack.

In my desk drawer at work, I have a wonderful collection of old UFO nuttiness from the early 1990s. It’s wonderful stuff – wildly imaginative zines full of poor writing, even poorer graphical presentation and absolutely wonderfully muddy thinking. Back in the day, you used to have to really take your nuttiness seriously to publish this stuff.

Today, it’s easy. Far too easy, which means there’s an absolute flood of poor quality nuttiness, and no real way to distinguish the dross from the gems. Which is why I embrace Arnd Bernaerts, the author of the thesis that naval warfare is behind climate change. Or something like that. I’m not entirely clear on the hypothesis. But in my mailbox the other day, I got a copy of Bernaerts’ book on the subject, which has all the hallmarks of the best UFO work I so enjoyed back in the day: poor graphics, (but lots of them!), a wonderfully self-consistent collection of strange anecdotes and an absolutely impenetrable thicket of argument that seems so obviously clear to the writer and absolutely incomprehensible to me.

Back in the day, I had a good deal of journalistic fun debunking nuttiness, but I’ve come to realize it’s rather like destructive hurricanes: bad in principle, but impervious to journalistic assault. So I largely ignore the field these days, leaving the battle against the forces of weirdness to others. Instead, I choose on occasion to simply embrace the nuttiness. And as a connoisseur, I suggest Arnd’s fine work is worthy of the embrace.

A Moment of Silence…

if you please, for the 32 journalists who died this year serving you in Iraq:

Violence in Iraq claimed the lives of 32 journalists in 2006, the deadliest year for the press in a single country that the Committee to Protect Journalists has ever recorded. In most cases, such as the killing of Atwar Bahjat, one of the best-known television reporters in the Arab world, insurgents specifically targeted journalists to be murdered, CPJ found in a new analysis.