Elephant Diaries: Why solving “the Web problem” does not solve the problem

From today’s NYTimes article about the San Francisco Chronicle: The Chronicle’s Web site, SFGate.com, draws an unusually large audience for a paper its size, three million to four million people monthly, according to Nielsen Online, but generates a fraction of the paper’s revenue. If serving readers on the Internet is your measure, the Chronicle has …

Continue reading ‘Elephant Diaries: Why solving “the Web problem” does not solve the problem’ »

My Random and Totally Unscientific Cap-and-Trade Headline Survey

Sat down with my favorite search engine’s news goober this evening to see what’s up with cap-and-trade, and I can report that the sweep of coverage had a certain consistent flavor. Some representative headlines: US Might Not Benefit from Cap-and-Trade Cap-trade on carbon may push up costs Cap and Trade: A Huge, Regressive Tax Cap-and-trade …

Continue reading ‘My Random and Totally Unscientific Cap-and-Trade Headline Survey’ »

On High-Probability, High-Consequence Events

My friends in the nuclear weapons community have, over the years, helped me understand the tools for thinking about low-probability, high-consequence events, like a warhead accidentally going off. You really don’t want that to happen, so even though averaged across all possible futures the average badness might be relatively low, it’s worth spending some time …

Continue reading ‘On High-Probability, High-Consequence Events’ »

Stuff I Wrote Elsewhere: Sandpile Edition

On Joshua Cooper Ramo’s Age of the Unthinkable: Instead of tanks and planes and armed battalions, we face “adaptive microthreats and ideas,” like improvised explosive devices made of cheap cell-phone components. Because of such thinking, Ramo writes, “no major power has been able to defeat an insurgency anywhere in the world” since World War II. …

Continue reading ‘Stuff I Wrote Elsewhere: Sandpile Edition’ »