Pinning down that “not Twain” quote

Alex Breitler has done us all a useful service, not only debunking the Not Twain “Whiskey’s for drinkin’” quote but also pinning down, via Barbara Schmidt, where it first got attached to Twain: She believes, based on a Google Books search, that the quote probably was first attributed to Twain in the 1960s.    

“already contested issues”

I had occasion this evening to revisit “Sensitivity of Streamflow in the Colorado Basin to Climatic Changes,” by Linda Nash and Peter Gleick, circa 1991: Water availability, quality, and demand may be affected by higher temperatures, new precipitation patterns, rising sea level, and changes in storm frequency and intensity. Water supply and water management in …

Continue reading ‘“already contested issues”’ »

Stein’s Law and Colorado’s Water

I’ve become entranced with “Stein’s Law” as an alternative to the faux Twain “water’s for fightin’ over” as a cliche to help guide water policy rhetoric: If something cannot go on forever, it will stop. The draining of Bonny Reservoir in eastern Colorado to comply with the terms of the Republican River Compact – such …

Continue reading ‘Stein’s Law and Colorado’s Water’ »

The conservation-revenue dilemma, private sector edition

On the subject of the problem of declining revenue from water conservation, there is this, from the February 2009 10-k filed by American Water Works, a private water utility, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission: Increased water conservation, including through the use of more efficient household fixtures and appliances among residential consumers, combined with …

Continue reading ‘The conservation-revenue dilemma, private sector edition’ »

Stuff I wrote elsewhere: more on our forests burning

Lissa and I are in St. Louis, a wet place. I know it is a wet place because there is no dirt. Or, more specifically, there is no bare dirt. Something’s growing everywhere, the result of 38 inches (97 cm) precipitation per year. I’m always struck by that when I visit a wet place. While …

Continue reading ‘Stuff I wrote elsewhere: more on our forests burning’ »

Conservation and the water pricing dilemma

We see this over and over again. Generally speaking, water is free to municipal/industrial customers in the United States. What we pay in our water bill is for the cost of delivery – the pumps and pipes. We’re paying for water delivery infrastructure, not the commodity itself. But we nevertheless generally price the water by …

Continue reading ‘Conservation and the water pricing dilemma’ »

After we’re done with the Peripheral Tunnel, pyramids!

An economic analysis released last week suggested a Peripheral Tunnel to move California’s water around the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta could create 129,000 jobs. (Good Alex Breitler story lays out the details.) The boosters at the Southern California Water Committee jumped on the argument: This new jobs study on the tunnel options is the first major …

Continue reading ‘After we’re done with the Peripheral Tunnel, pyramids!’ »