Stuff I Wrote Elsewhere III: ABQ Water

Posted by on

Also from this morning’s paper, a brief report (business model, ad/sub yada) on yesterday’s Middle Rio Grande Water Assembly meeting. I tried to balance the progress made on water conservation with the grim message I’ve been pushing in my recent work on this regarding the supply-demand deficit in New Mexico’s heavily populated middle valley:

Water users along the Middle Rio Grande have made major strides in responding to our water deficit, experts said during a meeting Saturday in Albuquerque. But there is much more to be done if we are to avoid long-term problems because of our continued unsustainable water use, they said.

“We need to do more,” said Steve Hansen, a staff member of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and one of the founders of the Middle Rio Grande Water Assembly.

I’m curious whether y’all think “sustainable” is a good word here. Its plain English meaning is relatively straighforward, and it clearly applies here: the numbers show that we’re using more water each year than nature supplies, depleting ancient reserves in the process. But has “sustainable” acquired fuzzy baggage, a political context that has moved its connotations beyond its plain English meaning in a way that weakens its ability to make a straightforward point?

Stuff I Wrote Elsewhere II: Birds, warming and the desert

Posted by on

More blathering from the morning paper, this the tale of the fascinating work of Blair Wolf (sub/ad yada yada) a University of New Mexico biologist who studies the water consumption of desert birds:

The smaller a desert creature, the more water loss matters, and little birds like verdin are especially vulnerable, Wolf said. Sometimes, that teaspoon is not enough. On the hottest days, small desert birds can lose 5 percent of their body weight an hour to evaporation in a desperate struggle to cool off. If they cannot keep up, they die.

That rarely happens, but new research by Wolf, a University of New Mexico biology professor, suggests heat waves because of global warming will make survival far more difficult for desert birds.

This is in part a global warming story, because that was the narrow point of the paper at hand. But mostly, it was a chance to riff on Dr. Wolf’s work on how creatures survive in extreme desert environments. In particular, I found some fun parallels between the verdin Blair studies and the Bushmen of the Kalahari, which I happened to be simultaneously reading about in James Workman’s excellent Heart of Dryness. From the story:

The verdin, a bird that typically weighs less than a third of an ounce, for example, hunts insects in the cool of morning and evening, and sits still during the heat of the day, using shade whenever it can.

The technique is not that different from the approach used by people who live in the same environment, noted James Workman, an author and expert on desert water use by human societies.

For on-the-go 21st century Westerners, the techniques described in Workman’s book “The Heart of Dryness,” about the bushmen of the Kalahari desert in Africa, might seem odd.

“If you’re not in motion,” Workman said of the Western approach to living, “you’re wasting your time.”

But like Wolf’s desert birds, Workman notes, the bushmen have become extraordinarily adept at sitting still during the heat of the day and doing absolutely nothing.

They keep their mouths closed to avoid evaporation in their breath. Their only movement, Workman said in an interview, comes as they shift with the angle of the sun to stay in whatever bit of shade is available.

I’ll be doing a more full review of Workman’s book at some point soon (both here and in the newspaper). It’s a great read if you’re interested in water.

Stuff I Wrote Elsewhere I: Big Think Nukes

Posted by on

Lots of accumulated blathering from me in this morning’s newspaper. First up, a fun thumbsucker on the Obama administration’s rhetoric regarding zero nuclear weapons (sub/ad req.) and what it might mean in practice:

Supporters of a world without nuclear weapons, who include prominent hawks like former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, argue the world would be a less dangerous place.

Critics of the idea say the horrific nature of nuclear weapons prevents conflict between nations that possess them. “The likelihood of war goes up, not down” in a world without nuclear weapons, Robinson argued in an interview.

Ag Water in the West

Posted by on

Shaun McKinnon has a must-read story for those interested in western water in today’s Arizona Republic about the discussion in his state about the future of agricultural and municipal water use:

As Phoenix grew, the land available for farms shrank and water use shifted. As recently as 1965, 80 percent of the water delivered by Salt River Project was used by agriculture. Today, that number is just 15 percent.

Converting retired agricultural water supplies to urban uses helped Phoenix grow without the water issues facing Las Vegas, where there were never many irrigated fields. The canals that move water – particularly the Central Arizona Project canal, which taps the Colorado River – could help fuel more population growth if farmers were to give up some of their water.

But if farmers go out of business, the crops they sold in Arizona would be imported from another state or country. As their water is claimed by new development, cities would lose the backup water source, which would become more important if droughts worsen as climate scientists predict.

I recommend reading the whole thing, which lays out the dilemma(s): To what extent do we need to keep growing food with that water? To what extent is ag the most economically beneficial use? What are the policy mechanisms that might be used to manage what ag-urban transfers we make?

And while Shaun’s story focuses on Arizona, the exact same situation holds across the border in California, where the Imperial Irrigation District is the largest single Colorado River water user. At yesterday’s meeting of the Middle Rio Grande Water Assembly here in Albuquerque, the ag-municipal question was on everyone’s mind.

Birding the LA River

Posted by on

I used the Los Angeles River’s famed concrete as a bit of a stalking horse in a piece I wrote earlier this week. But Albuquerque birdwriter Judy Liddell points out that the concrete is not all there is to the old water course:

As it flows through central Los Angeles, it reverts to the concrete arroyo. However, as it approaches Long Beach, the river accumulates silt, allowing vegetation to grow in places. And by time it reaches Willow Street, the river becomes soft-bottomed, forming an estuary. At this location, the freshwater of the LA River begins to interact with the saltwater of the Pacific Ocean and is affected by tidal action. It also is a migratory stop-over and wintering grounds for a multitude of shorebirds, waders and waterfowl.

When I checked the Los Angeles Rare Bird Alert prior to my most recent visit, I kept noticing sightings at the Willow Street crossing, which I discovered was near my friend Carole’s new home in Long Beach. After our visit with Carole, my friend Sue and I spent two hours enjoying this gem of a location.

LA River

LA River

For me, Repo Man is what first comes to mind when I think of the LA River. Judy’s piece suggests another image as well.

(Picture CC, courtesy jondoeforty1)

$1,000 an acre foot

Posted by on

I’m always intrigued at the chance to see the price of a water transaction in the West. Usually it’s hidden, but a transaction being discussed among some Colorado River Communities offers this glimpse. From Jim Seckler’s story in the Mohave Daily News:

George said the plan would be for the MCWA to keep 500-acre feet of water for industrial use and sell 1,000 acre feet to Bullhead City, Lake Havasu City and the MVIDD, who would each pay $1,000 per acre feet or $1 million for the water.

Limbaugh, Revkin and the Blues

Posted by on

I wasn’t sure what additionally needed to be said about Rush Limbaugh’s shameful attack on Andy Revkin the other day, in which he suggested the New York Times reporter might help the planet by committing suicide. (Charlie Petit has a nice rundown on the various things being said about it.)

But I thought the issue noteworthy as an example of he poisonous atmosphere surrounding the media-politics-policy-science interface on the issues Andy covers. So I downloaded David Folkenflik’s excellent NPR piece onto my laptop yesterday to play for a UNM class I was speaking to.

I noticed this morning on the laptop that iTunes had categorized David’s piece as belonging to the musical genre “Blues”. That seems somehow appropriate.

Rivers Without Water

Posted by on

In the comments on Nora’s Salt River picture, DG shared a link to a wonderful story of a group of German World War II POW’s who escaped from a camp in Arizona:

The plan was to float down the Cross Cut Canal, then to the Salt River, to the Gila River and on to the Colorado River which would take them into Mexico. Three of the men had constructed a canoe which could be taken apart and carried in three pieces. They had blocked up the drains in the shower room to test it for water-tightness. It never occurred to the Germans that in dry Arizona a blue line marked “river” on a map might be filled with water only occasionally. The three men with the canoe were disappointed to find the Salt River bed merely a mud bog from recent rains. Not to be discouraged, they carried their canoe pieces twenty miles to the confluence with the Gila river, only to find a series of large puddles. They sat on the river bank, put their heads in their hands and cried out their frustration.

Groundwater Regulation

Posted by on

Cally Carswell has a story in the latest High Country News about domestic groundwater wells in Washington state that nicely illustrates a common problem throughout the western U.S., including here in New Mexico.

In Washington (like in New Mexico), you can legally drill a well to serve domestic needs – essentially a single house. Individually, any one well doesn’t sufficiently diminish an aquifer or drain surface water enough to make it a problem. Collectively, though, it’s becoming a big issue:

Under the doctrine of prior appropriation, in which the oldest claims  are first in line for water, domestic wells, like all groundwater rights, should fall behind surface water rights. But while Washington law recognizes that groundwater and surface water are connected, the state restricts groundwater withdrawals only if their impact on more senior rights can be shown. Such connections are especially hard to prove for exempt wells, which are scattered and individually draw small amounts of water. So they operate unrestricted even during extreme droughts.

We haven’t had conflicts here in New Mexico like the ones Carswell describes, but the legal issues are similar. State statute here was interpreted for years as explicitly exempt such wells from regulation, but a state court decision on the Mimbres River last year ruled the law conflicted with the constitutionally enshrined doctrine of prior appropriation because of the way groundwater pumping diminishes surface flows. Michael Campana had a nice writeup on the issues last year.

(h/t Elaine for sharing the HCN story)