Hot Day in New Mexico

From the National Weather Service

PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE ALBUQUERQUE NM
734 PM MDT MON JUN 5 2006

...RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURES FOR MONDAY JUNE 5 2006...

LOCATION                HIGH TEMPERATURE     PREVIOUS RECORD
------------------------------------------------------------
TUCUMCARI                    103               100 IN 1980
PORTALES                     102 TIED          102 IN 1990
DEMING                       101 TIED          101 IN 1996
DEMING AIRPORT               100                99 IN 1980
ALBUQUERQUE VALLEY           100                98 IN 1996
ALBUQUERQUE SUNPORT           98                97 IN 1996
FARMINGTON                    98                94 IN 1946
ALBUQUERQUE FOOTHILLS         96 TIED           96 IN 1996
SANTA FE                      96                93 IN 1946
RATON                         95                93 IN 1946
GALLUP                        94 TIED           94 IN 1996
LAS VEGAS                     93                91 IN 1946
CHAMA                         87                85 IN 1996

To try to get a feel for the urban heat island where I actually live, in the middle of town, I’ve set up an old cotton region shelter in my backyard with surplus NWS thermometers. I’ve had thermometers for a while, and they usually read hotter than the official Weather Service reading from the airport, but I never knew if my setup was comparable. Now it is.

Yesterday’s high in my backyard was 106F.

update: 106F = 41C

The Old Schwartzman Property


Schwartzman

Originally uploaded by heinemanfleck.

Richard Metcalf’s story in Thursday’s Journal spurred me to ride down past the old Schwartzman property this morning, down in Albuquerque’s South Valley.

It’s 500 acres of land, much of it still farmed, dating back somewhere into Albuquerque’s distant past when farming was what we did. According to Richard’s story, the Schwartzman family moved here in the 1880s, and ran a “vertically integrated” meat-packing operation on the land, from feed, to cattle, to slaughterhouse.
Continue reading ‘The Old Schwartzman Property’ »

The Immigrant Threat to our Way of Life

Dr. Swamp Cooler today speaks bravely about the threat posed by immigrants to our way of life:

The decision to issue Swamp Cooler Photo ID cards was made unavoidable due to the influx of migrants (California, Ohio, Illinois, Texas, etc.) who come to New Mexico with alien notions of air conditioning that have become a threat to us all.

Dr. Swamp Cooler could not ignore numerous reports of migrant homeowners with refrigerated air conditioning trying to pass themselves off as traditional New Mexican swamp cooler owners.

If you show up at the home improvement store ostensibly looking for cooler pads, water pumps, tubing, compression nuts or any number of things you forgot to buy on the first trip, it is imperative that you actually need these things.

We can’t allow swamp cooler fraud to shred the social fabric.

On the Radio

If you’re in Albuquerque, you can catch me on the radio this afternoon at 2, talking with Kim Johnson and Dave Thomas of New Mexicans for Science and Reason. We’ll be talking about science journalism. Or something. I’m not sure exactly what, but I trust Kim and Dave to ask some sort of useful questions.

Journalism, Hurricanes and Climate Change

Alex Witze has an excellent news piece in Nature this week summing up the back-and-forth on the hurricane-global warming link. It shows the debate leaning in the direction of those arguing for a link, but also suggests how currently unsettled the issue is, and why.

I think she gets it just about right.

Over in the comments at Prometheus, I’ve been arguing with Steve Bloom about how journalists should report the discussion. Steve posits:

“an awful lot of people have begun to conclude that the Webster/Emanuel camp is right…. Why shouldn’t journalists begin to draw the same conclusion?”

My answer is that the debate is lively, the question is unsettled, and the best available expert consensus review by the World Meteorological Association reflects the fact that the quesiton is unsettled. To report otherwise would be to pick sides. That’s not what mainstream journalists do (or should do).

Steve points to Nature’s editorial accompanying Alex’s piece, which concludes: “In the past year, an emerging consensus has suggested that rising sea surface temperatures may well be causing hurricanes to become more intense over time,” suggesting that the editorial is an example of good journalism on the issue. But that’s an editorial – Nature’s expression of its institutional opinion on the question, not a news reporter’s explanation of the state of the science. Editorials are supposed to take sides.

More important, though, is a later bit of discussion in the Nature editorial, which Steve and those like him, arguing for the hurricane-global warming connection, should heed:

More worryingly, the science of hurricanes and global warming seems to be falling into the same trap that has ensnared climate-change research for two decades. Researchers are lining up into distressingly familiar camps, with some arguing for the link between tropical storms and climate change, and some against it. They duel at press conferences and snipe at each other on the Internet and in the literature, each side trying to dissect the other’s data.

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I refer readers to Daniel Sarewitz on this point, who has ably documented the way public policy and political debates become intractable when disputants choose up sides with competing scientific authorities to support their views.

Steve’s on risky ground here. On the broad questions of anthropogenic climate change, he and the other members of his camp have the IPCC and other expert reviews on their side. Such expressions of consensus provide strong support for their arguments and, I believe, strong support for political and public policy decisions. As soon as they abandon that cover on the hurricane question, picking a side while the science remains unsettled, they lose the authority of their argument.

Ancient Art

Chauvet cave painting The cave paintings of Chauvet-Pont-D’Arc captivate me. Our ancestors were making art in depths of the last ice age, long before they domesticated food. It takes all kinds of hubris and reductionist deconstruction to imagine why they were doing it, so I’d rather just let it be and enjoy the fact that they did it.

The news of the day (hat tip to some smart wire editor at my morning paper) is a find in Vilhonneur forest – a 27,000-year-old cave painting of a human face with a skeleton. It’s said to be, possibly, the earliest artistic representation of a human face.

RSS

A correspondent poses an interesting question about the usability of RSS feeds for non-geeks. I love RSS, but the way I use it is completely geeky, so I’m probably a bad test case. If you’re reading this blog via an RSS feed, how are you doing it? What sort of software interface are you using, and how easy is it to use?

Elasticity

Despite a not insignificant investment of brain cells, I admit to continued ignorance of the ways of economics. Perhaps some of the smart people who read this blog can help me understand this:

Gasoline demand for the four weeks ending May 26 averaged over 9.3 million barrels per day, an increase over last year, despite average retail prices in May being 75 cents per gallon higher than they were a year ago.

Traditional economics would suggest that when the price of something rises, we buy less of it, right? I don’t get it.